Choosing between the Leica R 35mm Elmarit and Summicron for videography is a decision that hinges on your specific needs and shooting style. Both lenses are exceptional, but they cater to different priorities. This in-depth comparison will help you determine which lens best suits your filmmaking endeavors.
What are the Key Differences Between the Leica R 35mm Elmarit and Summicron?
The core distinctions lie in their optical designs, resulting in varied image characteristics. The Elmarit is known for its compact size and sharper images, especially in the corners. The Summicron, while slightly larger and heavier, boasts a more pleasing rendering of bokeh, often described as smoother and more aesthetically pleasing. This difference in rendering impacts the overall mood and feel of your videos.
Which Lens is Sharper?
The Leica R 35mm Elmarit generally offers sharper images, particularly at the edges and corners of the frame. This makes it an excellent choice for projects needing extreme detail and clarity. However, the Summicron's sharpness is still very high, and the difference might be negligible in many real-world scenarios, depending on your aperture and focusing technique.
Which Lens Has Better Bokeh?
The Leica R 35mm Summicron generally receives higher praise for its bokeh quality. Its rendering of out-of-focus areas is often described as smoother, more creamy, and more aesthetically pleasing. This can be particularly important for videography where drawing attention to your subject through selective focus is crucial. The Elmarit’s bokeh is still good, but it might appear slightly less pleasing to some viewers.
How Does Size and Weight Affect Videography?
The Leica R 35mm Elmarit is significantly smaller and lighter than the Summicron. This portability can be advantageous for handheld shooting or when working with lightweight rigs. The reduced weight also minimizes strain during prolonged filming sessions. The Summicron's added size and weight might require more robust stabilization equipment.
Which Lens is Better for Low-Light Videography?
Both lenses perform reasonably well in low light, but differences exist. The Summicron's slightly faster maximum aperture might provide a marginal advantage in extremely dark conditions, allowing you to use a slightly higher shutter speed while maintaining a usable exposure. However, both lenses will benefit from using appropriate supplemental lighting.
Is One Lens Better for Certain Video Styles?
The choice often comes down to stylistic preference. The Elmarit, with its sharper images, might be preferred for documentary-style work where clarity and detail are paramount. The Summicron, with its smoother bokeh, might be better suited to projects with a more cinematic or artistic feel, where a shallow depth of field is frequently used to isolate subjects.
What About Image Stabilization?
Neither lens features built-in image stabilization. You'll need to rely on external stabilization solutions like gimbals or steadycams to achieve smooth footage. The lighter weight of the Elmarit might make it slightly easier to stabilize with handheld techniques, though the difference is relatively minor.
Which Lens is Right for Me?
Ultimately, the best lens depends on your individual priorities. If extreme sharpness and portability are your top concerns, the Elmarit is a fantastic choice. If smoother bokeh and a more cinematic look are paramount, the Summicron is the better option. Consider your typical shooting style, preferred aesthetic, and budget when making your decision. Both lenses represent high quality and will deliver excellent results. Reviewing sample footage from both lenses might help solidify your choice.
